Experiences of My Grandparents … in the 3rd Reich

What we can learn from the history of National Socialism  Spireo reflects on the experiences of his grandparents, who lived through National Socialism. He begins by observing that a dictatorship often develops gradually. It starts with the sudden presence of uniforms, and soon everyone is forced to conform. Spireo’s grandfather, a civil servant, could not stand against the Nazis. The goal for many people in such situations is simply to survive, to try not to be sent to the front.   This story shows that dictatorships rely on followers. Conformism becomes the norm, and individual actions are shaped by ideologies imposed from above. Spireo wonders how strong our own barriers are against rising ideologies when they suddenly become omnipresent.The causes and consequences of World War I  A pivotal moment in German history was the end of World War I when Germany was forced to pay reparations on a massive scale. Spireo posits that these financial burdens and the inflation of the 1920s laid the groundwork for the rise of National Socialist ideology. The desperation and feeling of being oppressed as a nation created a climate in which people were willing to follow extreme ideas.  The Germans felt they were in a bad situation and sought solutions. The National Socialists took advantage of this sentiment and created a scapegoat. Everyone had to “pull together,” as Spireo puts it. Anyone who did not comply was branded a national traitor, and no one dared to step out of line.The continuity of power structures and their consequences  After World War II, the Germans often shifted the blame for the atrocities of National Socialism onto a handful of evil men, most notably the man with the mustache. Spireo draws a comparison to religious ideas, noting that it almost seems as if one person took the blame for everyone, similar to Christian concepts. It seems to him like a repression of the unconscious, but for real insight and reconciliation, awareness and acceptance would be crucial.   It would be a mistake to believe that only a few were responsible for the crimes. The power structures remained largely intact after the war, and many people found themselves in new, adapted roles. Spireo recognizes a pattern in history that he describes as recurring waves. History moves in cycles – history repeats itself, as a famous quote goes. This wave structure, where there is rise and fall, is a central feature of human history for Spireo.What does this mean for us today?  Spireo concludes that people should learn from history. The repetition of certain patterns can be seen in many historical epochs, and he warns against blindly following the ideologies of the present. Human nature seems to be to remain in comfortable monopolies until the catastrophic consequences occur. But he also believes that if people truly took responsibility as shapers of their own future, the development of humanity could follow a more upward-directed path, rather than an endless rollercoaster.  Spireo concludes his thoughts with a call to learn from the past to shape the future better.

 
 
 
Article on Wikipedia: Weimar Republic, about the political and economic problems in Germany after World War I: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic   Article on History: National Socialism and the Seizure of Power: https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/nazi-party   

Link to the YouTube video with English subtitles

They Are Always for the Beautiful and Good: Moralizing as a Tool

Politicians and Their Alignment with the “Beautiful and Good”

Spireo begins by observing that politicians are often seen as representatives of the “Beautiful and Good”. A Russian saying cynically suggests that they always stand for the positive and never for the hardships or the negative. Spireo sees this as politicians adapting to current trends and sentiments. When the mood shifts, they simply change their position.

Spireo compares this observation with experiences from socialism, where the ideology always emphasized the Beautiful and Good — for the people, for peace, and for a better life. According to the news, plans were often overachieved, and the enemy forces were held back by the border wall. The will of the people was nearly completely implemented, as shown by election results with over 99% voting for the Block parties.

The Importance of the National Front in Socialism

In socialism, there were various parties, but all pursued the same goal. The so-called National Front was a political structure that fought against everything bad and “not-so-beautiful.” Spireo draws parallels to today’s world, where the demand for unity and conformity on certain issues is also present.

Today, it seems similar to the days of the DDR: Anyone not supporting the Beautiful and Good is perceived as an enemy of society. This was also the case when someone opposed the Party or the National Front — it was quickly interpreted as an attack on peace and the people.

The Hypocrisy Behind the Facade of the “Beautiful and Good”

Spireo calls it hypocrisy to claim that one is always for the Beautiful and Good, because no one can always hold that opinion. In history, such as in the National Socialism era, blame was often assigned to a central figure like the “man with the mustache,” while other people submitted to the regime. Similarly, in the DDR, it wasn’t only Honecker who was responsible. Instead, it was the ordinary people — teachers, policemen, and neighbors — who upheld the system.

Spireo emphasizes that although politicians may embody the Beautiful and Good, it is society that supports this mindset. After the end of socialism, many people suddenly changed their opinions. Those who had once believed in socialism became opponents — a phenomenon known as “Wendehälse.”

Parallels to Today’s World

Today, Spireo recognizes similar patterns: Politicians promote the Beautiful and Good, but often focus more on global issues than on the concerns of their voters. A quote by Mario Adorf illustrates this: “If someone is responsible for everything, they are responsible for nothing.” The Beautiful and Good is used today as a justification for various political measures, such as in energy matters.

Spireo criticizes that people often do not question or even understand these developments, which reflects a certain indifference. Many of today’s events remind Spireo of the DDR, and he calls for close observation of these trends. Step by step, what people once valued is being altered by focusing on the Beautiful and Good.

In conclusion, Spireo notes that honest communication is necessary to recognize and prevent these developments. Without an open dialogue, the narrative of the Beautiful and Good continues, without society truly questioning what lies behind it.

 
 
 
Link to the YouTube video with English subtitles