Author: admin

The 3 Functions of a Currency

The Importance of Money in the Modern Economy

Money plays a central role in our daily lives and in the economy as a whole. We spend a significant portion of our time earning and spending money, often without fully understanding how it is created or who controls it. Money is not just a simple medium of exchange but a fundamental component of a functioning economy.

The Three Main Functions of Money

Money has three central functions in the economy: It serves as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and a store of value. As a medium of exchange, it facilitates the trade of goods and services without the need for direct barter. As a unit of account, it helps compare the value of different goods and services. Finally, it serves as a store of value, allowing money to be saved over time without losing its value.
In a functioning economy, these functions play crucial roles. Without money, people would need to barter directly, which is nearly impossible in a complex society. The function of a unit of account allows for price comparisons and informed economic decisions, while the store of value function underpins saving and investment.

Trust as the Foundation of Currency

The value of money is fundamentally based on the population’s trust in its stability. This trust is supported by government legislation and the economy’s ability to provide goods and services. As long as people are confident that their money will maintain a stable value in the future, the currency remains functional.
An example of the importance of trust can be seen in the former East Germany (DDR). There, state control and manipulation of the currency led to a loss of trust in money. The result was an inefficient economy where money no longer adequately fulfilled its functions.

The Dangers of Currency Manipulation

History shows that the manipulation of currencies can lead to severe economic crises in the long term. When governments increase the money supply to achieve short-term goals, people lose trust in the currency’s stability. A well-known example is the Roman Empire, whose decline was partly hastened by the gradual reduction of gold content in its coins.
Manipulative monetary policies may bring short-term benefits but lead to inflation, loss of value, and economic instability in the long run. This illustrates how crucial a stable and trustworthy currency is for the health of an economy.

 
 
 
Link to the YouTube video with English subtitles

The Center of Every Universe

The Center of Every Universe: A Reflection on Centrism and Consciousness

Hey, it’s great to meet again. Today, I want to talk about another aspect of the universe. This is centrism, which shows us that there is an equivalence between the large universe and the smaller I-universe. This reflection is meant to help us better understand how our perspective and our consciousness shape the universe.

Centrism: The Central Role of the Self in the Universe

Let me show you an example. These huge wind turbines here—they sound like an airplane. This is what reality looks like: a universe as a concept for the whole—everything is contained within it. I’ve been thinking about how to begin, but one must say that the materialist would argue that the universe is everything. Yesterday, I spoke about the I-universe—the I-universe is everything I know. The large universe, the cosmos, is everything humanity knows. Now, the materialist might say it’s not just what we know, but also what we don’t know. I’ve called this the ambiguity of the concept of existence elsewhere. If one proceeds in this way, they eventually come to absurd ideas like piano-playing monkeys in an infinite universe where all possibilities exist.

From a spirealistic perspective, that’s nonsense. There is only what we know and name. The thought exists. Therefore, I see a universe as everything that one can know and name. There is an analogy that begins with the self: I am always in the position of a central player, like on a stage—the star of a film. The I is always present. The periphery seems less significant.

The Universal Tendency Toward Self-Centering

We have terms like egocentrism, egoism, and many synonyms for it: self-centeredness, self-interest, selfishness, self-love, narcissism, self-centeredness, selfishness, self-focus, ego-mania, self-exaltation. These are all terms that are related to the central focus on the self. Based on how we experience the world, this is a normal thing. We are always at the center. Anyone who hasn’t received higher education might thoughtlessly blurt out, “I’m the most important.” But what is more significant is that everyone thinks this way to some extent. Some more than others, but taking one’s perspective as important is a natural thing. One must realize that this perspective exists.

Then we have on the other side, because I’m talking about universes, the issue that some believe there is only one universe. But if the universe is everything that a consciousness knows, then I can say that a consciousness is shaped through communication when people communicate. For example, the peoples around the Mediterranean thought they were at the center of the world. That’s why they called the Mediterranean the “Mediterranean.” Or the Chinese word for China means “Middle Kingdom.” The Chinese thought they were the center of the universe. The Chinese character for China is a target with an arrow in the middle.

I always say the universe is a metaphor for consciousness. Here we have the central perspective. In cosmology today, it is seen this way: From Earth, it seems as if the Earth is the center of an expansion of all galaxies—the farther away, the faster they move away. But people are wise enough not to say that Earth is the center of the universe because that would be ridiculous, especially if one considers the universe as unlimited and infinite. They say the universe has no center, and from any point, one would see the same thing. This, in my view, is a turn of materialistic science toward a more spiritual perspective. Perhaps at every point in the universe, one would perceive the same if there were a consciousness there.

The Ongoing Development of History and Knowledge

Regarding the cosmos and the movement of celestial bodies, egocentrism and self-love were widespread. People used to think that Earth was the center of the universe and that everything revolved around it, especially the sun. Today, we have the heliocentric worldview: Earth revolves around the sun, not the other way around. A few hundred years ago, this was a matter of debate. Galileo Galilei had a dispute with the Catholic Church, which said that Earth was the center of everything because God created Earth for humans. It was unimaginable that Earth could revolve around something else. The celestial bodies were created to serve humans. Galileo Galilei and Copernicus observed that Earth revolves around the sun, which is our current understanding.

There are also ideas that make this centrism of humans, this egocentrism, tangible, for example, the idea of humans as the crown of creation. From a spirealistic perspective, that seems a bit ridiculous. As part of creation and a source of information, humans are naturally not the crown of creation. An assumed God who could see everything might hear this and say, “Oh, I’ll send a few bolts of lightning.” But I think that’s part of creation—that every thought can be thought, even one of self-exaltation. This centrist view is common to every universe, which suggests that every universe is also consciousness.

The idea of humans as the crown of creation, that their thinking is unique, and they look at an unconscious nature, is a phenomenon of egocentrism. I think Plato’s Allegory of the Cave also has something to do with this. Humans believe at every moment that they are at the peak of something, and humanity as a group also does. The Allegory of the Cave shows a continuous process. Plato describes how humans naively sat in the cave and mistook the shadows on the wall for reality. Now they step into the light and see the full splendor of nature. At the same time, there is a longing for the old naivety.

The GDR was such a cave where everyone was blinded by propaganda. Capitalism seemed harsher to some, and there are people who long for the GDR. They want to go back but feel that it’s not possible. You can’t return to that naivety that existed back then. The propaganda was there, and people believed it a little, even though they knew that life in socialism wasn’t so great. It was often a waste of time, like when riding a bike and the valves were bad, and one had to wait a long time for replacements. In the West, everything was just there in a well-ordered shelf; you only had to pay the price.

In this context, it seems like we’re heading back to where we say we have to manage scarcity. History unfolds in waves—it reaches heights, but also depths. Therefore, history can never end, and knowledge can never come to a standstill. What we know today has a half-life. The idea that we are at the pinnacle is absurd, just as the idea that Earth is at the center of the universe is absurd. Equally absurd is the idea that one is the star of a film, which leads to many further implications, such as shyness. You think you’re being watched by many people, but fail to realize that everyone has their own I-universe and stands at the center of their universe.

I’ll leave it at that for now. I’m glad you were here and hope you stayed until the end. I wish you would subscribe and hit the bell. See you next time, bye, over and out. [Music]
 
 
   Article on Wikipedia:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model  
Link to the YouTube video with English subtitles

Development Occurs in Waves

Why Social Development is Cyclical

Why can’t a society continuously progress from a lower state to a higher one, becoming wiser and stronger in the process? This question arises when we look at the history and development of nations. It seems to be a law of nature that societies grow, then eventually decline, while other societies rise. This phenomenon can be compared to the growth of a tree.

The Cycle of Growth and Decline

A tree begins as a young sapling, weak and easily influenced by external forces. Over time, the tree becomes stronger and more resilient. But the growth never stops. Eventually, the tree becomes a colossal structure, its branches become overgrown, and finally, the tree collapses under its own weight. This natural process is also reflected in human societies. Even those of us who often believe we possess all wisdom experience the reality that what once brought prosperity can eventually break down over time.

Changing Consciousness as a Driving Force

After World War II, Germany faced significant challenges. People were poor, many were homeless, and basic resources were scarce. However, through wise political decisions, such as those made by Ludwig Erhard, who freed the economy and did not control prices, an economic upswing was achieved. Over time, however, the consciousness of the people changed. In the past, people were hungry and eager to work hard to achieve prosperity. But as wealth increased, a certain complacency set in. Society began to take the status quo for granted and focused on merely managing what had been achieved.

The Role of Politics and Society in Cycles

It is important to recognize that politics is often a reflection of society. When the consciousness of the people changes, this is also reflected in political decisions. The idea that prosperity is guaranteed and only needs to be managed led to a form of decadence in society. Politics evolved accordingly and adopted concepts such as **Modern Monetary Theory** (MMT), which advocates for the uncontrolled printing of money. However, these developments have long-term harmful effects on society.

In summary, social developments occur in waves, similar to the fluctuations in stock markets that move in a zigzag pattern. These fluctuations are a natural consequence of changes in societal consciousness. Rather than placing all the blame on politics, we should recognize that the entire society contributes to these cycles.
 
 
 Article on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Monetary_Theory

 
Link to the YouTube video with English subtitles

I-Universe, the Concept

Introduction to the Concept of the I-Universe

The concept of the I-Universe is based on the idea that everything is spirit and that matter does not exist independently. When we say that everything is spirit, we look into a space full of spirit, where what we perceive as matter is merely a manifestation of the spirit. The difference between spirit and matter is often misunderstood in materialism, as materialism views matter as something independent and absolute. In contrast, Spirealism asserts that the world has a spiritual nature and that matter exists only in connection with the spirit.

When we consider the concept of the I-Universe, the question arises as to what it means and why it is relevant. The basic idea is that the universe we experience is an interplay of many small I-Universes that together form a larger whole. This larger whole is determined by the principles of spirit that exist in each of us.

The Relationship between Spirit and Matter

Spirit and matter are inextricably intertwined. In Spirealism, it is emphasized that matter cannot exist without the spirit. Thoughts are not just fleeting impressions; they have a real impact on the world as we perceive it. When we think of something, chemical and electrical processes occur in our brain that are associated with these thoughts. As a result, our thoughts shape the world as we experience it.
In materialism, it is often assumed that the world exists independently of us and that we are merely observers. In contrast, Spirealism argues that the world is recreated by our thoughts and perceptions at every moment. This continuous creation of the world in the now is at the core of the spirealistic perspective.

The Uniqueness of the I-Universe

Every I-Universe is unique and individual. Each person carries only a small part of the total knowledge of humanity within them, and this knowledge is weighted and structured differently in each I-Universe. The thoughts we have and the meaning we assign to different concepts vary from person to person. This means that no I-Universe is the same as another, even though they are all part of the larger universe.
The idea of gravity is used as an analogy to explain how different thoughts and concepts within an I-Universe interact with each other. Some thoughts have more weight and attract other thoughts more strongly, while others have less significance and therefore have less influence on our thinking. This demonstrates how complex and individual each I-Universe is and how it influences the way we perceive the world.

The universe as the sum of all I-Universes is a central element of Spirealism. The idea that reality as we know it is a projection of many small I-Universes leads to the realization that we are all interconnected and that our thoughts and perceptions shape the shared image of reality. This connection between the I-Universes explains why we often cannot separate ourselves from the opinions and thoughts of others, as they attract and influence us due to their number and intensity.

 
 
 Eckhard Tolle, Now: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jetzt!_Die_Kraft_der_Gegenwart
Link to the YouTube video with English subtitles

Materialization

 

Introduction to the Significance of Matter and Mind in Spirealism

In traditional materialism, matter is considered something physical, visible, and independent of the mind. This view has developed over millennia and continues to shape scientific and philosophical discussions today. However, in Spirealism, matter is not seen as independent from the mind but rather as its product. This perspective opens up new possibilities for understanding the world and the phenomena we observe.

In materialism, the prevailing notion is that matter and mind are strictly separated. Matter is therefore something visible, such as a table or a chair. These things are seen as indisputable reality. Thoughts, on the other hand, are considered invisible and are only indirectly perceived through the behavior of others. In contrast, Spirealism inseparably connects matter and mind.

 

The Role of the Mind in the Creation of Matter

Spirealism assumes that everything that exists must first be conceived in a thought. The thought is the actual creator, without which there can be no matter. Matter is therefore not only a physical substance but also a thought of that substance. This viewpoint turns traditional materialistic ideas upside down and opens new paths of thinking.

A central aspect of this way of thinking is the idea that the body represents a connection of mind and matter. Why shouldn’t a table or another object also be the result of such a connection? Spirealism offers a more comprehensive explanation of how matter is created and the role the mind plays in it.

 

Challenges and Limits of Materialism

Materialism reaches its limits when it comes to explaining phenomena that cannot be explained solely by physical processes. Quantum physics shows that the properties of particles depend on observation, which points to the existence of mental elements. These findings suggest that materialism may not be sufficient to explain the entire reality.

In Spirealism, however, the separation of matter and mind is dissolved. This approach could revolutionize the way we understand the world and help us explain phenomena that have so far been considered inexplicable. It is becoming increasingly clear that a purely materialistic view cannot cover all aspects of reality.

 

The Future of Spirealism and Its Significance for Understanding Consciousness

Spirealism could be the future way of thinking that overcomes the limits of traditional materialism. It offers a perspective that considers mind and matter as inseparable, allowing for a deeper understanding of the world. This viewpoint could lead to new insights, particularly in areas such as quantum physics and the study of consciousness.

Another aspect of Spirealism is the idea that our individual consciousness is part of a larger, all-encompassing mind. Our creativity and thinking are expressions of this larger mind that permeates and influences us. Many artists and musicians report that their creativity comes from an unknown source beyond their own minds. This larger mind could play a central role in how we understand the world and ourselves.

 

New Insights into Animal Cognition

An interesting example of the application of Spirealism is our view of animals. In the past, it was often assumed that animals could not think because they do not speak with us. This assumption led to the belief that animals have no mind. Today, however, we know that animals can indeed think and have consciousness. This insight raises the question of what other forms of consciousness might exist that we do not yet understand.

 

Summary and Outlook on Future Research

The materialization of things from the perspective of Spirealism represents a revolutionary way of thinking that overcomes the traditional separation of matter and mind. Matter is thus a product of the mind, and consciousness plays a central role in the creation of reality. These insights could fundamentally change the way we understand the world.

In summary, I see the future in a way of thinking that unites mind and matter. Future research could explore how the materialization of thoughts works within the larger consciousness and what impact this has on our understanding of reality.

 
 
  More about Spirealism: https://spireo.de

 

Is the World Round or Flat?

Introduction to the Relativity of Knowledge
The question of whether the world is round or flat may initially appear amusing. Every modern person knows that the Earth is round. Spaceships have photographed the Earth and clearly shown it to be round. However, from a spirealistic perspective, I would like to illustrate that the assumption that things can only be seen in one specific way is not always correct.
Influence of Consciousness on Reality
Einstein once said that it is not self-evident that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. He pointed out that there are peoples in the South Pacific who believe that the shortest path between two points is a winding line. This view depends on the consciousness and reference systems of people. Our consciousness and our cultural backgrounds significantly influence how we perceive the world. Einstein thus points out that the starting point for any further beliefs is a basic assumption that, from a spirealistic perspective, is merely a variant of truth that can only be called false from the perspective of other beliefs.
Change of Historical Beliefs
Historical examples illustrate how beliefs can change. It was once believed that Christopher Columbus discovered America, until it was found that the Vikings had already established settlements there around 1000 AD. Also, the alliance between Hitler and Stalin before World War II was long unknown and changed the picture of these politicians. This shows how dynamic beliefs and truths are. Another remarkable example is the Middle Ages in Europe when the geocentric view of the world prevailed and the sun had to revolve around the Earth until scientific advances by Copernicus and Galileo revolutionized this view.
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave and the Manifestation of Consciousness
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave can serve as a metaphor for changes in consciousness. Consciousness manifests itself in both higher and lower forms. An example of this is the transition from a free society to a dictatorship, where it is dictated what people should think. The narrative of society plays a crucial role here. This narrative not only reflects the current reality but also actively shapes it by reinforcing certain perspectives and beliefs.
Significance of Narratives and Ideologies
Narratives and ideologies influence how we see the world and our position in it. If a society accepts the narrative of a flat Earth, it shapes ist truth and ist reality. This acceptance can lead to other information and perspectives being ignored or rejected. The metaphor of Plato’s Cave, in which people only see shadows of reality, shows the power of consciousness and shared beliefs in shaping our reality.
Meta-Reality and the Role of Metaphors
When considering the universe as a metaphor for consciousness, one recognizes that consciousness understands the essence of reality through metaphors. A video game generates a certain reality, depending on the processor. Similarly, it is with our consciousness and the reality we experience. Every notion can also be understood as a metaphor. A significant metaphor from modern physics is the idea of parallel universes, which allow for the simultaneous thinking and experiencing of different realities.
Integration of Different Worldviews and Beliefs
For us humans, this is relevant because we are part of a larger consciousness. Thus, it is possible to live with the idea of both a flat and a round world. People used to think the world was flat because it looked that way and they couldn’t imagine a huge sphere. It is arrogant to think there is only one correct belief. Considering the Earth as a sphere may be practical but is not the only possible truth. Regarding the modern conception of multiverses and blurred realities, different beliefs and worldviews become equivalent perspectives of a comprehensive universe.
Thinking in Models and Hypotheses
In modern science, we often start from models and hypotheses. These models are tools that help us understand complex phenomena. Like the metaphor of the flat Earth, different scientific models can lead to the same conclusion, even though they have different basic assumptions. This underscores the relativity of knowledge and truths. Quantum theory and relativity theory are examples of how seemingly contradictory models contribute to the calculation and prediction of physical reality.
The Role of Technology and Science
Technology and science play a crucial role in shaping our consciousness and beliefs. Through new discoveries and inventions, our worldviews are constantly changing. The invention of the telescope and later the microscope expanded our perspective on the universe and the microscopic world, changed our beliefs, and enhanced our consciousness of the complexity of reality.
Conclusion: The Diversity of Thought Worlds
Worlds and thought worlds can be different, and concepts can become so different that they are no longer compatible. The idea of a flat world as a metaphor alongside the round world can be meaningfully integrated into an overall context. I chose this provocative topic to encourage reflection and explore the possibilities of consciousness. The diversity of thought worlds is a valuable aspect of our existence and underscores the importance of tolerance and openness to different perspectives and truths.
Relevant Links:
⦁ Article on Wikipedia: Theory of Relativity – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity
⦁ Article on Wikipedia: Plato’s Allegory of the Cave – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_Cave
⦁ Article on Wikipedia: Philosophy of Mind – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_Mind
⦁ Article on Wikipedia: Christopher Columbus – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Columbus
⦁ Article on Wikipedia: Geocentric Model – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model
⦁ More on Spirealism: https://spireo.de

Link to the YouTube video with English subtitles

The Concept of the I-Universe

The Concept of the I-Universe

The I-Universe is a highly fascinating concept that encompasses all thought objects of an individual. It parallels the external universe, which includes all known and potentially recognizable objects. Unlike the materialistic approach, Spirealism views the I-Universe without distinguishing between known and potentially recognizable thought objects.

Parallels between the I-Universe and the External Universe

  1. Size and Observation:
  • I-Universe: The I-Universe never seems disproportionately large or small. It adapts to the individual’s perception and always appears in a sufficient size.
  • External Universe: The same applies to the external universe, which is perceived as larger with increasing scientific observation. The more we discover about the external universe, the larger it appears to us.
  1. Expansion through Cognition:
  • I-Universe: In the I-Universe, new thought objects can arise through intense reflection and observation. This growth resembles the expansion of the external universe through new discoveries.
  • External Universe: Scientists find that the external universe seems to grow with every new discovery and every new instrument that allows us to look deeper into space.
  1. Gravity of Thoughts:
  • I-Universe: Gravity in the I-Universe is a kind of “thought gravity.” Thought objects influence and attract each other, leading to the formation of new thought objects.
  • External Universe: In the external universe, there is physical gravity that attracts and holds masses together.
  1. Spatial Characteristics:
  • I-Universe: The I-Universe appears uniformly round in all directions. It has an apparent boundary due to our materialistic worldview, which suggests that every existence must exist on a timeline.
  • External Universe: The external universe also appears uniformly round in all directions and seems to have a boundary that we cannot see but strongly suspect.
  1. Apparent Limitation and Openness:
  • I-Universe: In the I-Universe, there seems to be a boundary because we often believe that our current state of knowledge is sufficient. However, this boundary is often overcome by new insights.
  • External Universe: In the external universe, this boundary also appears, but discoveries constantly prove that the universe is actually limitless.

Matter and Thoughts in Spirealism

In the Spirealism approach, there is no material world as understood in the materialistic worldview. Instead, material objects are considered objects of consciousness. These thought objects can fluctuate, meaning they can transform and change. In contrast, matter appears solid and consistent, though it is also changeable when we observe long-term changes.

  1. Thought Objects versus Material Consistency:
  • Thought Objects: Thoughts are fluctuating and changeable entities. They can constantly change and reform.
  • Material Consistency: Physical objects appear solid and unchangeable, although they also change in the long term, such as eroding rocks.
  1. Deep Consciousness:
  • Spirealism: In Spirealism, it is assumed that the apparent solidity of matter is based on a deeper level of thinking that is not directly perceivable. These deep layers of consciousness manifest in the physical world and form material consistency. The possibilities within Spirealism lie in consciousness and, embracing possibilities, are not to be limited. The fact that we cannot perceive this is due to our own limited consciousness (humans as a small part of a comprehensive consciousness).
  • Materialism: Materialism assumes that completely free consciousness observes, interprets, and forms physical matter. The boundaries of what is possible, therefore, lie in matter, not in the spiritual.

Consciousness and Existence in Spirealism

The I-Universe and the external universe offer valuable metaphors for human consciousness. In Spirealism, individual consciousness is part of an all-encompassing consciousness that exists in every matter, every living being, and all natural phenomena.

  1. Metaphors for Consciousness:
  • I-Universe: The I-Universe, encompassing all known thought objects, represents a metaphor for individual consciousness.
  • External Universe: The external universe, which appears to be infinite, serves as a metaphor for the infinity and vastness of collective consciousness.
  1. Existence and Thoughts:
  • Spirealism: In Spirealism, existence has its foundation in thought objects. These objects are formed and manifested by the deep layers of consciousness.
  • Materialism: In Materialism, existence is understood in the context of physical reality, with consciousness being considered a product of this reality.

Conclusion

The I-Universe offers exciting insights into the complex relationship between consciousness and reality. Spirealism poses a fundamental challenge to materialistic worldviews and emphasizes the importance of thought objects and deep levels of consciousness as fundamental components of our existence.

Philosophy of the Flux

Heraclitus’ Philosophy of the Flux

Heraclitus, a Greek philosopher from around 2000 years ago, is especially known for his essential statements: “You cannot step into the same river twice” and “Everything flows.” These statements are profound and remain philosophically relevant today. Heraclitus’ contemplation of the river serves as a metaphor for the nature of change and permanence in the world.Heraclitus was born around 535 BC in Ephesus and died around 475 BC. His philosophy posits that change is the fundamental reality. Often called the dark philosopher because he resisted clear interpretation and presented his ideas in a complex and multifaceted manner, Heraclitus begins with a simple concept, such as that of the river, to illustrate the constant change of things. Standing before a river, one recognizes that the water constituting the river is in constant flux. The water is incessantly replaced by new water coming from various sources. This continuous renewal of the river’s water makes it clear that one never steps into the same water when entering it a second time.

The Constant Change of Matter (Der Stetige Wandel der Materie)Heraclitus extends this idea to the entirety of things. Although things appear solid and constant, they are fundamentally in flux. This concept reflects the convictions of Spirealism, which holds that things arise anew in every moment. The only reality is the now, while memories of yesterday and visions of tomorrow are illusions. Modern physics supports this view to some extent, showing that matter at the microscopic level is not stable. The seeming constancy of things is an illusion, much like a film, which consists of a rapid succession of many individual images that together create a flowing motion.Heraclitus’ thoughts on the variability of matter also align with modern insights from quantum mechanics. In this science, it becomes clear that the subatomic particles that form the basis of matter are constantly moving and never completely static.

Nature of the Flux and Relativity (Das Wesen des Flusses und Relativität)To understand the nature of the flux, according to Heraclitus, it is not the structure of matter that is decisive. Rather—and this would be a more current interpretation—the enduring properties arise from its relative position to other things. For instance, the river remains an equal distance from certain fixed points like a house and carries an approximately constant amount of water, being always referred to by the same name.The constancy of the names and the relative location of the river underline its durability despite the constant material change. Heraclitus’ thoughts invite us to question the assumptions of materialism, which sees the world as consisting of solid, unchanging components. Things are always in motion and continuously changing, while their relative relationship remains constant.The river is a symbol of continuous change, and the fact that it remains the same suggests an underlying constancy behind the ever-flowing appearances. Therefore, Heraclitus postulates that the essence of a thing is not its material structure, but its form and behavior in the context of its environment.

Philosophy and Modern Sciences (Philosophie und Moderne Wissenschaften)Heraclitus points out that things are not as they are perceived in materialism. Rather, they are in constant flux. This idea resonates in modern quantum physics and other sciences. Also in Spirealism, which rejects the notion that matter exists in a traditional form, this philosophy is clearly visible.Heraclitus’ approach to investigating the universe is fundamentally different from today’s scientific methodology. He examines concepts and notions, thereby arriving at new and interesting conclusions. This method remains relevant as it encourages questioning the underlying concepts and our perception of reality.Heraclitus was also one of the first philosophers to emphasize the universal principle of Logos. The Logos is the rational structure of the universe and simultaneously the principle of change and balance. This aligns with modern scientific theories that postulate a deep underlying ordering principle in the universe.

Reflection and Conclusion (Reflexion und Schlussfolgerung)Heraclitus’ philosophy shows that the examination of concepts and meanings can be as valuable as empirical research with scientific instruments. By analyzing the concept of the river, Heraclitus came to the insight that change is the only constant. Similarly, we can gain new insights into the nature of reality by examining our concepts and notions.Heraclitus’ statements prompt questioning the perceived constancy of things and accepting the underlying truth of constant change. This is a valuable perspective not only for philosophy but also for the modern sciences, which continue to investigate the subtle aspects of change and constancy in nature.Heraclitus’ insights provide a meaningful foundation for understanding the dynamics and permanence in an ever-changing world. This leads to the recognition that our perceptions and expectations often do not reflect the true nature of things, but merely momentary states within a larger, continuous process.

 

Links:

Heraclitus – Life and WorkArticle on Wikipedia: A comprehensive overview of the life and work of Heraclitus, a significant early Greek philosopher known for his teachings on permanent change and the unity of opposites. Here is the link. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraklit

Article in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A detailed analysis of Heraclitus’ philosophy of constant change and the unity of opposites, with a special focus on his famous statement that one cannot step into the same river twice. Here is the link. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heraclitus/

Article on Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP): A contemporary interpretation of Heraclitus’ concept of constant change, including connections to modern physics and quantum mechanics. Here is the link. https://iep.utm.edu/heraclit/

Meta Description:Learn more about the fascinating philosophy of Heraclitus and his concept of constant change. Discover why “everything flows” and how his teachings still hold relevance in modern science today. Dive into the ideas of Logos and the profound analysis of the nature of reality.